Ali Al Bahlul: Free speech or terror PR?


Ali Hamsa Al Bahlul wаѕ convicted οf mаkіng promotional videos fοr Al-Qaeda, bυt іѕ thіѕ a reason fοr hіm tο bе imprisoned іn Guantanamo Bay. Iѕ іt a case οf free speech οr inciting terrorism? Iѕ a military court thе aptly рlасе tο try such a person?

16 Responses to “Ali Al Bahlul: Free speech or terror PR?”

  • MrSuperJuden says:

    America = freedom hahahahahaha

  • FrankinHolland says:

    Some poor guy in New York got jail time for showing Hezbollah cable channel in his apartment building block. I reckon “freedom of expression” crimes need to be prosecuted very carefully if we value our 1st Amendment.

  • ShadesofScorpius says:

    If this man is considered a combatant and is theme to a military tribunal, so then must the American mainstream media be tried under the same conditions – propaganda is propaganda is propaganda. We must hold the mainstream accountable for 9/11 and everything after.

  • Tressco says:

    Terror = war of the small people

    War = terror of huge people

  • serbfree says:

    fbi and cia and mossad
    make terror

  • odamanprime says:

    exactly =p you could be a terrorist tomorrow and just reckon, there’ll probably be someoene saying the same thing about you when it does happen

  • signboyy says:

    i wonder how soon americans who criticize the govt will be considered producing terrorist propaganda and will get life in prison

    did you criticize how the govt is spending all our taxes on wars instead of healthcare?

    life inprisonment for you

  • FreedomCanada2010 says:

    @ranchai100

    terrorist is a made up word that can be applied to anyone the government decides

  • youstupidwoman says:

    how is it proven who is a terrorists ,under what standard ,,your talking of a witch hunt like persons of salam , where any one need say witch , and the person involved , was tied up in a dunking chair, if they drowned they were innocent if they lived after being under water for 15 minets they would be burnt ,,

  • youstupidwoman says:

    if they are being held by Us powers ,Us laws must be implied ,if not international law is enacted , if the military is operating out side
    a constitutional act of either, it could be conceded as a act Mutiny against the constitution of the usa and so its people /and or international law ,

  • UndefeatedArmy09 says:

    Life in prison for a fucking video?This is a damn tarnish.

  • lorenzo8500 says:

    How dare you people go against the U.S. governement decisions. They know whats best for us aptly. (sarcasm)

  • barlog20 says:

    Alqeuda is al-kracka.Stop let the kracka fool ya`ll.

  • ranchai100 says:

    terrorists have no rights

  • thevideoman9 says:

    first

  • eternalduty says:

    watch?v=Tdrt0VkUiwo

    EPIC!!!

Leave a Reply