Robert Wanek Battling For Free Speech In Court


Kind οf аn update οn thе school vaccine update, nοt really though, simply bесаυѕе іf I discuss thаt issue I аm liable tο bе arrested.

25 Responses to “Robert Wanek Battling For Free Speech In Court”

  • 7bananatrees77 says:

    excellent luck dude

  • standup4america1 says:

    Keep it up Robert, we have faith in you!

  • galegregory97comcast says:

    i guess you were the one for the minnie
    thy reckon thy win not by a long shot in thy face / thy cant take it when you do more
    then thy do / thy are rong thy will pay
    we are in the end game with god
    there NUTS your not lol to most of the post IF IT WAS NOT FOR HIM ALEX JONES AND OTHER AND ME YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AS THIS YOU DONT HAVE ANY FUCKING RIGHTS FUCKER
    AS WE FIGHT FOR DAM RIGHTS YOU FUCK US OVER / SO DONT YOU HAVE A NICE DAY OVER MY RIGHTS

  • Snowblindinfinity says:

    I know sometimes you look inside, and wonder if it’s all worth it, but know that because of you, and others like you, we are closer to the truth, not just about 911, but about all of the lies, the crimes, the cover-ups, the scams, the total truth is appearance out now, and soon the world will demand a change for the better and an accounting from persons who stole our world. Your chosen path is yours alone, though many will walk with you from time to time. Never give up the excellent fight.
    ~Concord and Like.

  • standup4america1 says:

    @EXXONMATRIXTV its amusing how you just steal John’s name and reckon your cool, fucking pussy ass bitch

  • kolkrabe19 says:

    You are praying to God that he fails ?

  • EXXONMATRIXTV says:

    Keep up the excellent work pawning Robert Wanek kthorn612, he needs to be place back in his place.

  • EXXONMATRIXTV says:

    I pray that you fail in court and you have to pay lots of money to compensate the instructor you are harrassing and victimizing with your bullshit.

  • EXXONMATRIXTV says:

    Clean your zit covered face and take your damn vaccine.

  • NsaneSk8er007 says:

    I didnt use the camera you moron, the footage clearly indicates this.

  • TripleC86 says:

    Thank you Robert. I wondered why you hadnt been posting new videos. Excellent Luck, and again Thank you.

  • kolkrabe19 says:

    @kthorn612: 15 comments ! I checked your channel, you are not even a subscriber, maybe a closet subscriber, haha. Hey mister/miss, Robert Wanek owes you nothing, okay ? If he posts a vid, that´s excellent, if he doesn´t, then he doesn´t. Generally, when people are involved in some stupid legal battles, it´s better to be a small, let´s say, “circumspect”. This is perfectly normal. If he isn´t publishing material relevant to his case, I´m sure he knows why he isn´t. Hope you know that.

  • kolkrabe19 says:

    @kthorn612: You are writing a dozen comments when 1 would suffice.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 8…
    It is rather odd of Robert to be surprised, shocked, and outrage that he got suspended for his actions when in the school handbook it says that he could be theme to suspension for using a video device to videotape on school property.

    Yet, in the description of the video that has been circulating with it, Mr. Wanek states:

    “But, the punishment for handing out flyers was a 2 day out of school suspension which was issued to me. This is ludicrous unjust and downright fascist.”

    Hmmm

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 7…

    Breckenridge High School’s handbook.

    “Personal phones or electronic devices with photographic/video capabilities used as photographic/video instruments are not allowed in the school building. Persons using these phones/electronic devices in the school as a photographic/video device will be theme to suspension for a period of time designated by the administration.”

    Mr. Wanek was using an electronic device with video capabilities on school grounds and was suspended for two days.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 6…
    It is my hope that Robert is being absolutely truthful and prevails. In the meantime, I am expressing the reality of the situation on my end and how Robert has presented it thus far.

    It is Robert that has made issue and made public these events and has gotten support of the truth movement over the matter. And it is his responsibility to eventually show with undeniable and demonstrable fact that belief in his tale has not been misplace by misrepresentation.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 5…

    So future auxiliary and secondary proof could be in the form of video and vid of documents…

    Robert’s parents’ authentication.
    Robert’s attorney’s authentication and commentary.
    Arrivals to the court house for hearing and court dates, video of the publicly showed docket showing Robert’s appointment in court.

    All of this being provided in the future after the case will fill in much of the unknowns and provide what I say is presently lacking.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 4…
    You see my skepticism exists because there are really so many voids and nothing presented to date is actual undeniable and tangible proof.

    Because to be honest and objective on the matter, Robert has not provided any real proof that his tale is right. This is not to say he is lying, but he has not presented anything to prove its truth…there is all the room for it to be manufactured or exaggerated. It is authentication to be sought here…not blind faith on someone’s word.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 3…
    That would then lead me to further inquire if the case is criminal, civil or both.

    And if Robert filed the case as the plaintiff against an individual for assault and/or the school. Or if the individual and/or school has called Robert into court and he is the defendant.
    Or if the court case is not even about assault, but is about your freedom of speech being violated.

    When the time comes to present the encounter in documentary fashion this too would be a relevant revelation.

    .

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 2…

    In the future, when you will be able to talk of the case, should you state that you did not call the police or file a report then I will be unusual as to why you did not?

    I will also want to know why did your parents not call the police and file a report when you knowledgeable them of the assault upon you when you got home that day.

    Again this police report for the crime of assault and battery on a minor with witness corroboration shown on video will add credibility. No problem.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Pt. 1…

    So, for when that time comes these are the issues I would then address.

    In your video, your description of the physical fight, without a skepticism, is assault AND battery on a minor with witnesses.

    So, you called the police. And filed a police report for these criminal charges against that someone who did this to you.

    Which means, for your case, that you have a copy of this report. And when the case is over you can present publicly this doc as proof of that claim.

  • kthorn612 says:

    So let’s just accept that you are under a gag order from the judge. Then I could know, how in the internet, you would not want to discuss even one aspect of your case. It is not worth taking the risk should the order be in effect.

    Which means, in time, we shall wait for further developments and then these issues can be addressed with something tangible that will corroborate all claim made regarding your encounter at school and in court.

  • kthorn612 says:

    Please direct me to where have you posted your attorney’s.

    My skepticism with the lack of any undeniable proof to your statements can hardly be characterized as unwarranted.
    It is warranted by the very lack of tangibles cited.

    As far as “childish”, that is just an have a crack to be insulting and avoid anything substantive regarding my comments.

    And in your answer you have now stated that after two hearings you are officially under a GAG ORDER by the judge concerning your case. Truly?

  • NsaneSk8er007 says:

    I’ve already posted my attorneys name on the internet so stop with your wild claims. On the second hand, your skepticism is unwarranted and childish.

  • NsaneSk8er007 says:

    I would be held in contempt. do you know what a ‘gag’ order is?

Leave a Reply