Scientology Trying to Stop Free Speech on the Net 2010
Thіѕ іѕ a re-cap fοr people whο аrе newer tο thіѕ, аbουt hοw Scientology opened phony accounts аnd whу, аѕ well аѕ hοw thеу υѕе thеm tο try tο ѕtοр free speech οn thе Net having tο dο wіth thеіr abuses thеу want аnd need tο keep hidden. Thіѕ hаѕ absolutely failed аnd hаѕ resulted іn literally people ALL over thе world helping expose thеіr many abuses, аnd I thank уου аll fοr thіѕ.
TruthSeeker, you see what you’re doing aptly now? What you’re doing aptly now is what Tory used to do. She grew out of it – you haven’t. And she’s out and pleased, while people who are still in are being beaten by David Miscavige and women still in are being forced to have abortions, while they reckon they are working for their eternity for a “religion” made by a con man. Wake up!
Hey Truth! Did you notice how these fucking $cientology assholes stay on kids to stalk and scare them into not protesting. Do you reckon that is a sick fuck asshole scientology thing they do? I do.
@RoyalPrinceXenu Yeah, You’re not incorrect there but I’m talking about now – and hopefully, HOPEFULLY that’s not what is going on now.
Remember the Inquisition? Christianity has its crimes as well.
How many people were executed and their lands confiscated to make the Vatican as rich as it is today?
This by no means excuses Scientology’s contemporary crimes in a “higher-tech” society.
I live a highly compartmentalized life, and have six different YouTube accounts.
No, I don’t cross-reference persons accounts.
In Australia, Senator Stephen CONroy is seeking to CENSOR the net. He has deliberately blocked the terms “Internet Filter” to prevent his APH site being search plotted.
An effort to establish a Senate Inquiry into Scientology in Oz was also blocked–efforts are still continuing.
Who else thinks the margin of the accounts that spam your page, were made by one person? It must be a sad existence to sit and make 20 accounts to argue with yourself essentially.
So Tory, you’ve noticed the numbers at the pickets dropping too?
As for WWP, they won’t let me come back on , they are frightened shitless of me.
I got into an line of reasoning with “TinyDancer” and was winning the line of reasoning so in order not to lose the line of reasoning she banned me. It’s like getting into an line of reasoning with a police officer and just when you are about to win the line of reasoning, he arrests you.
I was just starting to have fun ripping up their candy asses when it was all over
You know what?As far as I know,most religions don’t have a department (OSA + Auditing) that is place in place to scrutinize and examine your faith.Sure,Catholics etc may frown at you for being a bit lax in your faith,but all they do is encourage and suggest that you turn back to your god.
It’s a bit mafia-esque to have a system that man-handles you (psychologically & Physically) just because you,in being human, are naturally questioning material.
How can you be clear if you DONT question things btw?
I caught a Watchtower goon doing the same thing. In my video “The Watchtower Killed Bethany Abigail Hughes Help Lawrence Hughes Pay for Making them Pay.mp4″. Several different people with no uploaded vids dropped comments to the effect of “I read the actual court documents, that’s not what the case is about” “They never hid her from her limb of the clergy” etc etc etc. The accounts then shut down within days.
Do you reckon what your auditor did to you would have happened if LRH were still running the church at the time?
Do you reckon what your auditor did to you can be traced back up to David Miscavige’s way of running the church?
I don’t reckon they are trying to handle critics, as much as they are trying, as Tory said, to divert and distract in comment section.
For example, when an article appears in a publication, they will try to handle the situation by inserting lame comments, to bury the critical comments.
I myself, would not have noticed Scientology, had it not been for the Tom Cruise video coupled with his Lauer appearance. Both persons things made me reckon WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THIS GROUP!
About how I know three of the regular shills are Narconon grads (I don’t know what level they are…they never say that), I questioned them.
But you are assess in assuming I could be incorrect, since it could be just one person saying whatever.
After all Tory, we are only getting the truth out of you because you are out of the cult Tory.
Terryeo writes like a high school dropout consistently though, and I reckon he/she is a Narconon grad. Different people?
It’s a hall of mirrors, meant to distract.
From the wiki on alt.religion.scientology (first protest on the web):
On July 17, 1991, the alt.religion.scientology newsgroup was made by Scientology critic Scott Charles Goehring, who describes starting the newsgroup “because I felt Usenet looked-for a place to disseminate the truth about this half-assed religion” and in part as a joke.
PS: I did, one week-end, due to being picked on by “anons”, question to have my material taken off of WWP. I didn’t question to be banned, “Forever”. One of anonymous, who I knew from the beginning, told me at a picket: “You CAN come back, Tory, but just know you WILL be picked to death”. That…to me..isn’t an invitation.
Also, sure, **some** people will get bored and go on. I’d place $ on it, many have gotten either legal notices or PM’s just putting down “wasting your life” etc.: Whatever the “button”.
You can reckon it’s amusing, all you want. When I first met Anonymous (The night they posted they were going to crash C of $s web site, they called me). I told them, “OSA *will* Infiltrate you, and get you to turn on people like me, and others”. They said, “No way–we know the Net”. Then, 2 summers ago, it happened. And I’m now blocked from WWP FOR LIFE. Did I question for that? No. Pickets have gone from 500-20 or so. That isn’t an accident, nor is it amusing, to me, nor is it, “We’re just bored”.
No, I didn’t know that. Do you reckon that, or you’ve met people who were “in” who know that? I’m unusual, as they used to HAVE To have OT 7s or 8s, due to the content the critics (and now Anonymous) use. I still reckon this is right, but let me know, please. Yaude (OT 7 then) as I said, used to pretend to be ALL different kinds of people: A smart techie, a critic, now Anonymous, some moron, a blind person, someone who seems from another country, a witty guy: get it?
TLC
Another thing the Scilon comment propaganda force does is pile on early, to the most standard sites, like People magazine about Kirstie.
They will make neutral sounding comments about how they like Kirstie, and don’t reckon it matters what religion she is.
Or write things like, “I’m not a Scientologist, but if it has helped Kirstie, why do people despise her for it.”
The thing we have now, that makes it different from the early 1990′s, is so many other places to find the truth.
It seems to be a moderately small group of OSA, who are charged with posting in comment sections or in places like the Tom Cruise, Scientologist video, dominated by THOUSANDS of nonsense posts by “VaLLarrr.”
Did you know that most of these people now come through the Narconon program? My theory is that addicts turned Scilons are the most resistant to entheta.
They can’t risk any more Tory Magoos!
One dullard, Terryeo I reckon, once resorted to writing “splishy splashy” as a response to all.
That sounds like a very terrifying meeting you had before you got out Tory. I’m glad that you are out and many others are escaping the clutches of the cult. It just shows when you strip back the veneer of scientology, what you see are the appalling abuses. Have a nice w-e Tory
i find it amusing the Cult of Scientology are even trying to handel the internet critics of all things
Yeah, the total Anonymous-the-Internet-group vs. Anonymous-the-Scientology-critics thing seems to cause some confusion amongst the public, and the CO$ seems to like to play on that confusion when they counter-flyer, since their flyers are full of things that the local Anons on the street had nothing to do with and would oppose themselves. It’s understandable why Chanology is called “Anonymous”, because as I know it, one begat the other, and there are some common symbols.
you are soooo awesome tory! keep up the fantastic work opening eyes!
“Anons been around way before Chanology..? Clambake etc.” Of course. I’m speaking about the huge group of people, around the world, calling themselves “Anonymous” who indoors in 2008, in response to the TC video and OSA’s moronic “Handling”. TLC
This is in response to TheEnglishAthiest
asking: “Tory What do you reckon of persons who join Free org??”
It’s their choice. As long as they’re not using Hubbard’s abusive “Tech” (Which it’s my understanding they do not)—that’s up to each individual. I’m against their abuses. Like to all, thanks for your comments! Tory/Magoo