Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 22)
Thіѕ video іѕ copyright free fοr educational purposes. Feel free tο mirror thеѕе videos wіth οr without accreditation. Fοr οthеr videos οf thіѕ genre check out www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com Pаrt οf a rυn οf videos exposing thе аmυѕіng stupidity οf creationists аnd whу thеу deserve tο bе laughed аt. In each case thе creationist statements аrе shown tο bе disgracefully stupid bу even thе mοѕt rudimentary knowledge οf knowledge. In thіѕ episode Ben Stein іѕ taken tο task over hіѕ inability tο distinguish knowledge frοm free speech. Stein claims thаt persons whο qυеѕtіοn evolution аrе discriminated against, whereas іn reality thіѕ ‘discrimination’ іѕ merely people getting held accountable fοr demonstrating thеіr pathetic grasp οf both thе scientific method аnd scientific literature. In simple parody terms іt wουld bе lіkе a medic claiming thаt ‘I don’t believe іn sterilizing health check instruments, аnd іf уου ѕау otherwise уου аrе discriminating against mе, аnd censoring mу free speech.’ Thе scientific literature іѕ аn open arena. Anyone whο саn sustain thеіr claim wіth research аnd reason wіll gеt a hοnеѕt hearing. Creationists rесkοn thе οnlу reason thеу саnnοt compete іn thіѕ arena іѕ due tο prejudice, whеn іn reality іt іѕ merely thе fact thаt thеу don’t dο ANY research, lеt alone anything creditable οf being published.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN The very definition of knowledge is (factual knowledge)
Evolution has nothing to do with gods, it is a highly proven and widely accepted theory amongst scientific experts. Who do you reckon you are to argue with the very knowledege which has helped develop modern medicine which will 1 day inevitabley save you or your loved ones lives. If i started arguing about gravity with newton i would be laughed at, you are in the same position. sort your head out
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1. If 1 of the greatest minds in history is a bone head, then what do you call someone that calls darwin a bone head hmmm….a joke maybe?
a fucking disrespectful small no-body, an arrogant know it all creationist. If the theory of relativity challenged creationism you’d be calling einstein a bone head. 2. You say darwin gave the cause original life formation to god, well your aptly that is bone headish. But i assure you darwin did not believe in the christian god.
@ahmology
Not particularly. My mother for one, is a Catholic. She does not view all of the bible as a literal interpretation. Shes one to believe that God was the one who first made life…but then allowed evolution to carry on, on its own. Adam and Eve may be a symbolic reference to 2 people who engendered the first civilized peoples or even two groups or tribes of people who came together to form the one of the first human civilizations.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
with observed instances of speciation… how can evolution be pseudoscience?
ah aptly it cannot, but because you are theme to your severe cognitive dissonance, you are unable to acknowledge any evidence that calls your beliefs into question.
“observed instances of speciation” in google , thanks for playing I WIN.
@Arteanor: If you had reviewed my video you would know why the peer review process is null and void with respect to the pseudoscience of evolutionism
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE
@lmhjs1000 : Darwin is a bone head and did not know anything at any time especially 200 years ago when he was not alive. Darwin did concern himself with spontaneous generation, now called abiogenesis. He initially gave God the credit for the creation of the original life forms.
you double damn fool!
@ahmology Eh. I’m an atheist so it’s kind of irrelevant. I just reckon it’s kind of asinine to believe in an all-powerful creator with a hat full of parlor tricks. The pope is all for evolution.
@brokensuccubus well unfortunetly it doesnt work that way … i am sorry but i reckon its a hepocracy to believe in evolution and then take a religion which says adam and eve and the garden of eden … taking these tales wether in the bible or the quran in a non literal way is just saying well ” the tales arent aptly but the rest of the book is ” if it is supposed to be from god then it should be all aptly … dont u agree??
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
when you can name the logical fallacy i am using i will consider checking your video…
if you would liek to refer to a peer reviewed study i WILL check that…
@Arteanor :
Remove the spaces between youtube . com and then paste in the search box.
This is my response to your fallacious logic or any YouTube video author promulgating the cosmic lie of evolutionism:
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE
Really Ben Stein (Like most creationist leaders and “Scientists”) has a political agenda. He’s a former Writer for Nixon (I reckon) and basically by appealing to the common man’s ignorance and inherent dislike of education (as well as the religious nonsense they were taught as kids) they hope to gain political power for their own selfish gain.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWn
uh… how about citing something peer reviewed?
or how about you counter his claims with some evidence that supports creation???
i dont reckon you can manage…
Want to go to heaven? by a fucking plane ticket.
Stein is a politically motivated ignorant…..
Ben Stien noooo he has been assimlated by persons cultists
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN – I know what your trying to say, but stein is refering to abiogenisis at the same time as demeaning darwins intellect.
Darwin didnt specialize in abiogenisis, stein is a moron.
Darwin had a thousand times more knowledge about evolution 200 years ago than stein does now…show darwin a small respect stein? dont u reckon?
STOP LYING THUNDERF00T:
“It is evolution, in the broad sense, that associations inorganic nature with life, and the stars with earth, and matter with mind, and animals with man. ” *Julian Huxley, “At Random, ” in Evolution after Darwin (1960), p. 42.
“I am quite aware that many people object to the use of the term evolution for anything but the transformations of income substance. But I reckon this is undesirably narrow. Some term is undoubtedly looked-for for the comprehensive sense comprises three main phases. . We may call these three phases the inorganic a, if you like, cosmological; the organic or biological; and the human or psycho-social.” *Theodosius Dobzhansky, “Evolution,” in Encyclopedia Americana Vol. 10, (1982), p. 734.
WHO IS THE FOOL:
“Evolution, which is the strongest natural description, holds that the yucky features of the universe including galaxies, solar systems and planets; the transition from non-income matter to income organisms; and the diversity of life forms, including human beingsall erase as a consequence of the innate proclivities of matter and energy, as expressed by the laws of nature.” *Wilson, “The Origin of Life,” Did The Devil Make Darwin Do It? (1983), p 86.
WHO IS THE FOOL:
“The millions of diverse income species we find around us in the modern world are all descended from a common ancestor that lived in the remote past. The processes that have brought this diversity about are collectively called evolution.” *F. Ayala and *J. Valentine, Evolving: The Theory and Processes of Organic Evolution (1979), p. 1.
WHO IS THE FOOL:
“All income forms in the world have arisen from a single source that came from an inorganic beginning. So, according to the develop of evolution, the first income cell ‘evolved’ into complex multicellular forms of life; these ‘evolved’ into animals with backbones. Fish evolved into amphibia, amphibia into primates, and primates into man.” *A. Thompson, Biology. Zoology, and Genetics (1983), p.1.
@leftfootlouie Oooh! Here you are again! What it it with you and and North Sea Oil?
I am a burger flipper and I do NOT apreciate you weary my proffesion ,so blow it off .thats TWICE now.ha ha ha
BOYCOTT BRITISH PETROLEUM