TYT Hour – July 16th, 2010
www.theyoungturks.com Nеw TYT Facebook Page(!): www.facebook.com Subscribe tο thе FREE Video Podcast οn iTunes: bit.ly Stay οn υѕ οn Twitter: twitter.com DISCOUNTS: www.theyoungturks.com FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Note: Thе above two associations аrе fοr TYT sponsors. Read Ana’s blog аnd subscribe аt: www.examiner.com TYT Network (nеw WTF?! channel): www.youtube.com Check Out TYT Interviews www.youtube.com Watch more аt www.theyoungturks.com
@guitarfreak8900 Make that two. LMAO!
@MrBagelis7 I reckon this may be the stupidest most uncompromisable youtube comment I have ever seen. CONGRATULATIONS
son of a bitch we ainth young turks wtf is the name of this show young turks wtf ur turk mothers ass when the turk had a opinion about something they were some son of a bitches fucking animals in my a GOOD turk IS A DEAD TURK the 1 who raises persons shit is a bitch ass.
@funkateerkitty
If you don’t want to argue then you should not have answered.
Let me question you this question, if we are invaded by another nation, who stands to loose the most? The rich, assess? And what will be affected? Is it the $40K someone makes a year but spends on food and shelter? Or is it the “wealth” that has been accumulated by the rich?
The JUST thing to do is NOT to tax incoming but tax wealth, period.
@satarnag
Unless you in some way take over your son’s body after you die, he is a different individual, assess? If you give your money (after tax) to another individual, it is a returns to that individual, assess? Why should that returns, which he is earning solely because he is your son, different from his other incoming? Not to mention, he is getting 7 million tax free as it is.
IRS did come in 1913 with the 16th amendment. But, progressive taxation was used during the civil war.
@satarnag
I speak of the tea party of today, after the usurp if you want to interval yourself.
Just because you personally do not disapprove of Obama because of his skin, does not mean other people in your party are not racists. The so called “Tea Party Movement” might have borrowed something from Ron Paul but really started after Obama took office.
Speaking of ignorance, the total “Tea Party” theme is rather ignorant of history. The Boston Tea Party was about profit, not tax.
@IamtheSamis
And STILL! You’ve been saying you quit for days now, continuing the lie. You’re a hypocrite for calling my mistake a lie, and constantly so, when you made the larger mistake of saying I responded to you to initiation this all off.
And STILL! You’re going down the path of Red Herring, trying to drag the debate away from the police abuse. Maybe you should become a conservative politician, you have all the debate tactics.
@IamtheSamis
No, me saying I misread you saying conscience was saying I misread what you wrote, as you were asking me where you said Concise. Remember the context of the post I was replying to, it was you asking me where you had said concise, so I went and looked and you were assess, and I had misread, so I pointed out WHERE and WHAT I had misread. The rest has been your failing, not mine.
@BusinessIDBAI Lastly, even if this is one large misunderstanding the issue lies in how you worded yourself. “No,? the problem was, I misread you saying? CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI
What you should have written was “I misread you saying concise”. After I proved I didn’t call you non – concise you switched to conscience which is why I keep using “Wow dude, 3? posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI. Now I retire. . .
@BusinessIDBAI “The reason I would answer speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had really said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI -”No, the problem was, I misread you saying? CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI
But you didn’t speak about consciousness?
“Wow dude, 3? posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI
Next time use all 3 quotes together like I did. The 2nd quote proves my point. Give up, dude
@BusinessIDBAI “No, the problem was, I misread you? saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI
You forgot to paste this one along with it like I did earlier. You know, your original excuse that proves me assess. The quote you’re using to make my claims look inaccurate is the second excuse you used after I debunked the first one. I posted it along with my answer below to show how many times you excuse has altered. They are all your quotes
@IamtheSamis
And further more, you’re showing your inability to read:
“The reason I would answer speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you? said concise, when you had really said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI -
But you didn’t speak about consciousness?
“Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say?? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn’t your answer match – IamtheSamis -
Read that again, notice your error in comprehension.
@IamtheSamis
Can you give reasons for why I would speak about consciousness if I thought you said I wasn’t concise? It’s pretty amusing you’re talking about literacy when you don’t notice how your accusation is self-contradictory. As I said, and as you quoted, I misread you saying conscience, conception it as concise.
You sir, still go ahead and continue to lie, staying what, 1-2 days ago that you’re done with this conversation? And you lied about me responding to you to initiation this total thing. Projection.
@BusinessIDBAI “The reason I would answer speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had really said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI –
“No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI
But you didn’t speak about consciousness?
“Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI
Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn’t your answer match
@BusinessIDBAI Once again I will prove with your own terms how you are lying. The issue is that you claimed I accused you of being non – CONCISE. “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI – Your claim was proven fake so then you said “No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI – So if you thought I said conscience why did you make the first statement I quoted?
@BusinessIDBAI If you are literate you would see and acknowledge how you own statements prove you a liar. Here goes some research for you. Mark out CONSCIENCE and CONCISE. Then apply them to what I wrote in the first paragraph. To save you the effort and time, if you really thought I wrote conscience you wouldn’t have made the first statement I quoted. Read it for yourself, you defense doesn’t make any sense. You wrote about me not being concise, but you claim you thought it read conscience. . .
@IamtheSamis
The reason I would answer speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had really said conscience. Are you too stupid to comprehend that statement?
@IamtheSamis
You REALLY wanna drag this out don’t you? Trying to make a non-issue into an issue? Have you ever mistook something someone said and acted what you incorrectly perceived? I guess not, well, we have a new Jesus, perfect in every way!
How many times have you said you’re done? Yet here you are. A liar in every way, not only did you lie saying I responded to you, but you lied about leaving. Wow, the lack of honesty is incredible. Perhaps this is all projection on your part?
@BusinessIDBAI concise for conscience, but the only problem there is that I never said you weren’t concise. Which goes back to my original statement of you either you lying really or not meaningful the definition of conscience and concise respectively. So which is it? I just proved with your own statements that you didn’t misread anything. You claim you thought I said you’re not conscience, but in your answer you don’t address that at all. You just talk about me not being concise. I smell a liar.
@BusinessIDBAI You’re a liar and your own statements prove it. “No, the problem was, I misread you saying conscience. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI If this is the case then why did you then answer “”Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI. Are you too stupid to see how that doesn’t add up?If you thought I said conscience (which I did) then why would answer speaking about conciseness? That would in fact mean that misread
@BusinessIDBAI You must reckon everyone here is illiterate. All one has to do is look at how or dialouge started. I made perfectly valid points with no personal attacks whatsoever and what was your response? “He slammed a kid on a hood, get over it. This is LIGHT. I’ve been slammed on the impose a curfew, then on a hood when I climbed on the roof of my school when I was 13. It wasn’t traumatic, it’s not that huge of a deal. Get over it, breathe buddy, breathe”. Wow, what a sophisticated line of reasoning you make
@IamtheSamis
You are long winded, if I misread conscience for concise then THAT is why I would respond to that. You haven’t proved shit, and you’ve gone so far off the deep end with recognizing you have no points, that you just wanna talk about some manufactured lie. Get over yourself.
If you have NO points to bring to the table, then you’re done. I win, if you disagree with my position, but your only debate tactic is to attack, then you’re done, you’re gone.
@BusinessIDBAI instead you accused me of being too long winded which myself and everyone else who know the English language would know deals with the part of a statement. You saying you misread it doesn’t make sense because your answer doesn’t add up to this claim. What does “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say? I’m not concise?” have to do with consciousness? If you misread why would you answer in this manner? Anyway, I’m done. Others have already called you out and now I’m done too
@BusinessIDBAI You’re full of it. The first insult was made after my initial answer. I didn’t make any personal attacks and all you could say in return was that I was emotional and get over it. In fact you didn’t even start to use the phrase “ad hominem” until after I accused you of using such tactics. Lastly, I already proved how you lied, you didn’t admit anything. If you thought I said conscience instead of concise you would have spar about me not being conscience. Instead ??
@IamtheSamis
Most of your “rebuttals” consist of personal insults. I don’t respond to them, as its not an actual form of debate.
I related my teenage experiences because it is similar. Things happen, teenagers have mouths on them, and many of us really tried to get the police mad. If you have a problem with that, show how it isn’t similar.
And quit trying the ad hominem attacks! You’re like a five year ancient, learn to debate! Got to college, it’d be awesome.