Sympathy for da’ Hitler


Thе first half οf thіѕ іѕ јυѕt a small over view οf thе difficulty thаt fascism саn hаνе. Thаt being ѕаіd, іt’s rаthеr simple іn evaluation tο mοѕt political philosophy. It’s better tο figure thіѕ material out thаn tο paint wіth such a broad brush. Thе οthеr раrt tο thіѕ appears tο bе аn line οf reasoning fοr free speech аnd, іn a way, demonstrating a more modern brand οf fascism.

11 Responses to “Sympathy for da’ Hitler”

  • combattaskforce says:

    fascism:? christian-nationalism-militarism-empire building-corporate building. national socialism:
    race-christian-nationalism-militarism-non empire building-anti judaism.

  • Anekantavad says:

    Mussolini was originally scornful and even hostile to Hitler, but Italian fascism did certainly take on a racist and antisemitic tone. But you are aptly? that it was originally just nationalist.

    As for the SA, I would say that they were really to the left of the Nazi movement. It was their call for a Seconf Revolution against capitalism that frightened the industrialists into insisting that Hitler do something about them and their revolutionary rhetoric.

    Excellent vid!

  • Curas1 says:

    @Tommerman89 Yeah basically that and a little paranoia is what it’s all about.

    sometimes though it does seem like we live in a marxist state, well there’s that? paranoia…ahhh yeah. :>

  • PhilosophicalTwerks says:

    @Tommerman89 LOL, you know, I was on pajamas media’s youtube page (i have more subs than them now too) and? i left a comment saying they looked-for a real comedian and to dump crowder and i’d jump on board (better than having a real job) I’m still waiting for a response. They don’t seem to be able to admit comedy either, apparently.

  • Tommerman89 says:

    @PhilosophicalTwerks

    It would be nice if they learned how to be amusing too. I find? most far aptly people very un-amusing.

  • Tommerman89 says:

    @Celephais42

    Also in that “Nazi” is a brand in itself these days. It’s simple to admit symbols that we are not supposed to like if persons symbols were showed so proudly, as the Nazi’s did.?

  • Tommerman89 says:

    @Curas1

    Right that, and thats the total strength in Nazi-ism. Excluding others provides some illusion of belonging. I remember that shit on? the school yard.

  • PhilosophicalTwerks says:

    It’d be? nice if all the tea partiers had place a small thought or research into the Obama/Hitler signs too,

  • Curas1 says:

    @Curas1 btw I saw a movie once on DVD and it summed up the collective social mind of Nazism pretty well

    it was a 2003 foreign film called evil /watch?v=wq78hdCILaI

    and I reckon it’s pretty excellent for understanding the basic social dynamic of a social conservative regulated society.

    I never got into that kind of thinking myself, I know a gangster when I see one, but being? exclusionary can give you a powerful sense of inclusion if you are on the inside, a sense of function.

  • Curas1 says:

    Well you forgot all about the Japanese Imperialist that were ultra aptly nationalist, fun people persons Japanese.

    But though Hitler wasn’t really a nationalist he was just a dictator that used the nazi party as a means to a end and there is? a diferance between economic and social nationalism.

    All nationalist are regulated society conservatives instead of small government cons and are economic liberals, the peoples car was there for a reason.

  • Celephais42 says:

    It’s right, the aptly-wing are more like Italian fascists? than Nazis. I reckon what gives people the Nazi impression is the authoritarian policies and propaganda techniques of the aptly.

Leave a Reply