<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Hendrix &#187; defends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/tag/defends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com</link>
	<description>Political Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens Defends Obama Endorsement</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/28/hitchens-defends-obama-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/28/hitchens-defends-obama-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/28/hitchens-defends-obama-endorsement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens defended his endorsement of Obama on The O&#8217;Reilly Factor on Friday. Subbing in for O&#8217;Reilly was Laura Ingraham, and the exchange (who would have thought!) got a bit heated at times. Ingraham was rather incredulous as to how Hitchens could support Obama. Hitchens responded that everything Obama has said since his first debate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xzmXa8ylHfA?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xzmXa8ylHfA?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Christopher Hitchens defended his endorsement of Obama on The O&#8217;Reilly Factor on Friday. Subbing in for O&#8217;Reilly was Laura Ingraham, and the exchange (who would have thought!) got a bit heated at times. Ingraham was rather incredulous as to how Hitchens could support Obama. Hitchens responded that everything Obama has said since his first debate with Hillary Clinton &#8220;has been getting better.&#8221; Hitchens also, reluctantly, uttered rather harsh criticism of McCain: &#8220;McCain is, in my judgment, I hate to have to say it of such a person, is losing height, losing capacity, he&#8217;s just not quite the man he was. One proof of that, you might add, is his choice of running mate and potential vice president.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/28/hitchens-defends-obama-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck defends Tea Party &#8212; hits back at Mitt Romney and Scott Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/20/glenn-beck-defends-tea-party-hits-back-at-mitt-romney-and-scott-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/20/glenn-beck-defends-tea-party-hits-back-at-mitt-romney-and-scott-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BROWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/20/glenn-beck-defends-tea-party-hits-back-at-mitt-romney-and-scott-brown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck defends Tea Party &#8212; hits back at Mitt Romney and Scott Brown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y39vRmx9CLA?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y39vRmx9CLA?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Glenn Beck defends Tea Party &#8212; hits back at Mitt Romney and Scott Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/12/20/glenn-beck-defends-tea-party-hits-back-at-mitt-romney-and-scott-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hatch Defends his Faith- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/22/hatch-defends-his-faith-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-mormon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/22/hatch-defends-his-faith-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-mormon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latterday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/22/hatch-defends-his-faith-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-mormon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Hatch discussed on Fox News comments made regarding the Mormon Faith, Mitt Romney and Governor Perry stating that Article 6th of the Constitution explains their should not be a religious test for government. Senator Hatch further explains that Mormons are Christians.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9ycM1PZ0LR0?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9ycM1PZ0LR0?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Senator Hatch discussed on Fox News comments made regarding the Mormon Faith, Mitt Romney and Governor Perry stating that Article 6th of the Constitution explains their should not be a religious test for government. Senator Hatch further explains that Mormons are Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/22/hatch-defends-his-faith-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-mormon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminist Amy Siskind defends Sarah Palin on KFIV 1360 AM</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/feminist-amy-siskind-defends-sarah-palin-on-kfiv-1360-am/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/feminist-amy-siskind-defends-sarah-palin-on-kfiv-1360-am/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KFIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siskind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/feminist-amy-siskind-defends-sarah-palin-on-kfiv-1360-am/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feminist Amy Siskind of The New Agenda defends Sarah Palin on KFIV 1360 AM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_OAwh-cknw?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_OAwh-cknw?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Feminist Amy Siskind of The New Agenda defends Sarah Palin on KFIV 1360 AM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/feminist-amy-siskind-defends-sarah-palin-on-kfiv-1360-am/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Defends Big Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/23/gop-defends-big-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/23/gop-defends-big-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/23/gop-defends-big-oil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans defeated an attempt to cut taxpayer subsidies for large oil companies while pushing lies about the negative impact the cuts would have. Cenk Uygur breaks it down. Subscribe: bit.ly TYT Mobile: bit.ly On Facebook: www.facebook.com On Twitter: twitter.com www.theyoungturks.com FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Read Ana&#8217;s blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com Read Cenk&#8217;s Blog: www.huffingtonpost.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NgB9b5MUDto?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NgB9b5MUDto?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Senate Republicans defeated an attempt to cut taxpayer subsidies for large oil companies while pushing lies about the negative impact the cuts would have. Cenk Uygur breaks it down. Subscribe: bit.ly TYT Mobile: bit.ly On Facebook: www.facebook.com On Twitter: twitter.com www.theyoungturks.com FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Read Ana&#8217;s blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com Read Cenk&#8217;s Blog: www.huffingtonpost.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/23/gop-defends-big-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Stossel Defends Ron Paul On The O&#8217;Reilly Factor Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/06/john-stossel-defends-ron-paul-on-the-oreilly-factor-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/06/john-stossel-defends-ron-paul-on-the-oreilly-factor-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stossel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/06/john-stossel-defends-ron-paul-on-the-oreilly-factor-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope O&#8217;Reillys check dosent bounce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0wERyhNoZZ8?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0wERyhNoZZ8?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
I hope O&#8217;Reillys check dosent bounce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/06/john-stossel-defends-ron-paul-on-the-oreilly-factor-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart Defends Rapper Common on &#8216;O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8217;: Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/19/jon-stewart-defends-rapper-common-on-oreilly-factor-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/19/jon-stewart-defends-rapper-common-on-oreilly-factor-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WATCH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/19/jon-stewart-defends-rapper-common-on-oreilly-factor-watch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart Defends Rapper Common on &#8216;O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8217;: Watch The latest in the right-wing Common controversy: Jon Stewart accepted Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s challenge to debate over the rapper&#8217;s appearance at a White House poetry event last week on &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Factor.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Jon Stewart Defends Rapper Common on &#8216;O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8217;: Watch</b><br />
The latest in the right-wing Common controversy: Jon Stewart accepted Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s challenge to debate over the rapper&#8217;s appearance at a White House poetry event last week on &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Factor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/19/jon-stewart-defends-rapper-common-on-oreilly-factor-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin defends use of &#8216;blood libel&#8217; after US attack</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/21/palin-defends-use-of-blood-libel-after-us-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/21/palin-defends-use-of-blood-libel-after-us-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/21/palin-defends-use-of-blood-libel-after-us-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Palin defends use of &#8216;blood libel&#8217; after US attack US conservative celebrity Sarah Palin has defended her use of the term &#8220;blood libel&#8221; to accuse the media of blaming her supporters after the Arizona shooting spree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Palin defends use of &#8216;blood libel&#8217; after US attack</b><br />
US conservative celebrity Sarah Palin has defended her use of the term &#8220;blood libel&#8221; to accuse the media of blaming her supporters after the Arizona shooting spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/21/palin-defends-use-of-blood-libel-after-us-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin defends herself against &#8216;blood libel,&#8217; crosshairs criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/18/palin-defends-herself-against-blood-libel-crosshairs-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/18/palin-defends-herself-against-blood-libel-crosshairs-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crosshairs']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/18/palin-defends-herself-against-blood-libel-crosshairs-criticism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Palin defends herself against &#8216;blood libel,&#8217; crosshairs criticism She says &#8216;blood libel&#8217; referred to those &#8216;falsely accused of having blood on their hands.&#8217; She also asserts that Democrats have used the crosshairs imagery in the past. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, defending herself against criticism following the Tucson, Ariz., shootings, said Monday that she used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Palin defends herself against &#8216;blood libel,&#8217; crosshairs criticism</b><br />
She says &#8216;blood libel&#8217; referred to those &#8216;falsely accused of having blood on their hands.&#8217; She also asserts that Democrats have used the crosshairs imagery in the past. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, defending herself against criticism following the Tucson, Ariz., shootings, said Monday that she used the term &#8220;blood libel&#8221; to describe comments made by those who falsely tried to link &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/18/palin-defends-herself-against-blood-libel-crosshairs-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>oreilly defends mitt romney</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/11/oreilly-defends-mitt-romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/11/oreilly-defends-mitt-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/11/oreilly-defends-mitt-romney/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bill oreilly goes for the throat of evangelical bill keller who stated in a recent article that &#8220;a vote for romney is a vote for satan&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-sXrZRGx4rc?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-sXrZRGx4rc?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
bill oreilly goes for the throat of evangelical bill keller who stated in a recent article that &#8220;a vote for romney is a vote for satan&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/11/oreilly-defends-mitt-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

