<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Hendrix &#187; First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/tag/first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com</link>
	<description>Political Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First he gives our ports to them, and now, Prez Bush gives free speech to a tyrant?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/11/first-he-gives-our-ports-to-them-and-now-prez-bush-gives-free-speech-to-a-tyrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/11/first-he-gives-our-ports-to-them-and-now-prez-bush-gives-free-speech-to-a-tyrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[them]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyrant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/11/first-he-gives-our-ports-to-them-and-now-prez-bush-gives-free-speech-to-a-tyrant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you noticed how the far right likes to give free speech to tyrants but always want to stifle their own fellow americans?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you noticed how the far right likes to give free speech to tyrants but always want to stifle their own fellow americans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/11/first-he-gives-our-ports-to-them-and-now-prez-bush-gives-free-speech-to-a-tyrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the first amendment protect the consequences of free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/07/does-the-first-amendment-protect-the-consequences-of-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/07/does-the-first-amendment-protect-the-consequences-of-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequences.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/07/does-the-first-amendment-protect-the-consequences-of-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have told me that if it didn&#8217;t, then our speech is just like Saddam-Iraq speech where they were killed for speaking their mind. Shouldn&#8217;t the first amendment protect consequences?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have told me that if it didn&#8217;t, then our speech is just like Saddam-Iraq speech where they were killed for speaking their mind. Shouldn&#8217;t the first amendment protect consequences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/07/does-the-first-amendment-protect-the-consequences-of-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Idea: Get Drunk First</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/23/debate-idea-get-drunk-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/23/debate-idea-get-drunk-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/23/debate-idea-get-drunk-first/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LIONEL NY&#8217;s PIX 11 News Commentary Aired: September 10, 2011 I&#8217;ve a great idea to make debates more interesting: get &#8216;em drunk first.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ilUW582UqOs?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ilUW582UqOs?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
LIONEL NY&#8217;s PIX 11 News Commentary Aired: September 10, 2011 I&#8217;ve a great idea to make debates more interesting: get &#8216;em drunk first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/23/debate-idea-get-drunk-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Speech Restrictions not covered by First Amendment?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/free-speech-restrictions-not-covered-by-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/free-speech-restrictions-not-covered-by-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/free-speech-restrictions-not-covered-by-first-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are some of the restrictions to &#8220;free speech&#8221; that are not covered by the First Amendment?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are some of the restrictions to &#8220;free speech&#8221; that are not covered by the First Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/free-speech-restrictions-not-covered-by-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journal TV &#8211; Almanac Newsreels &#8211; First 300M.PH car, Flying into a Hurricane and the First Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/journal-tv-almanac-newsreels-first-300m-ph-car-flying-into-a-hurricane-and-the-first-tank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/journal-tv-almanac-newsreels-first-300m-ph-car-flying-into-a-hurricane-and-the-first-tank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[300M.PH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Almanac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Into]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsreels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/journal-tv-almanac-newsreels-first-300m-ph-car-flying-into-a-hurricane-and-the-first-tank/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of historical newsreels covering topics from the 1700&#8242;s through the 1960&#8242;s. Topics include news events, personalities, sports, entertainment, and more. Each newsreel runs approximately 3 minutes. This episode includes teh first 300M.PH car, Flying into a Hurricane and the First Tank.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FSyTbAKXt5M?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FSyTbAKXt5M?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
A collection of historical newsreels covering topics from the 1700&#8242;s through the 1960&#8242;s. Topics include news events, personalities, sports, entertainment, and more. Each newsreel runs approximately 3 minutes. This episode includes teh first 300M.PH car, Flying into a Hurricane and the First Tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/18/journal-tv-almanac-newsreels-first-300m-ph-car-flying-into-a-hurricane-and-the-first-tank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do so many Obamaphiles show disgust for the First Amendment Right to Free Speech, don&#8217;t they like freedom?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/08/why-do-so-many-obamaphiles-show-disgust-for-the-first-amendment-right-to-free-speech-dont-they-like-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/08/why-do-so-many-obamaphiles-show-disgust-for-the-first-amendment-right-to-free-speech-dont-they-like-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[many]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamaphiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[they]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/08/why-do-so-many-obamaphiles-show-disgust-for-the-first-amendment-right-to-free-speech-dont-they-like-freedom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear a constant drum beat to abolish freedom of speech &#038; press. What advantage could anyone gain from that. Today Congress held a press conference to say they were afraid of people calling them and saying something hurtful. For a start when was the last time a Congressman actually answered the phone A listed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear a constant drum beat to abolish freedom of speech &#038; press. What advantage could anyone gain from that.</p>
<p>Today Congress held a press conference to say they were afraid of people calling them and saying something hurtful. For a start when was the last time a Congressman actually answered the phone A listed number message only phone.</p>
<p>Sorry Congress your not believable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/08/why-do-so-many-obamaphiles-show-disgust-for-the-first-amendment-right-to-free-speech-dont-they-like-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conviction, Not Compromise! (Ron Paul&#8217;s First 2012 TV Ad)</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/06/conviction-not-compromise-ron-pauls-first-2012-tv-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/06/conviction-not-compromise-ron-pauls-first-2012-tv-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/06/conviction-not-compromise-ron-pauls-first-2012-tv-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free email updates: www.RonPaul.com Please like, share, subscribe &#038; comment! www.RonPaul.com 07 &#8212; Ron Paul is America&#8217;s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-America foreign policy. For more information visit the following websites: www.RonPaul.com http www.RonPaulNews.com http www.DailyPaul.com http]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dri0GwbBoIk?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dri0GwbBoIk?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Free email updates: www.RonPaul.com Please like, share, subscribe &#038; comment! www.RonPaul.com 07 &#8212; Ron Paul is America&#8217;s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-America foreign policy. For more information visit the following websites: www.RonPaul.com http www.RonPaulNews.com http www.DailyPaul.com http</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/06/conviction-not-compromise-ron-pauls-first-2012-tv-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did the Australian Government raise revenue for the first 100 years without an income tax?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/02/how-did-the-australian-government-raise-revenue-for-the-first-100-years-without-an-income-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/02/how-did-the-australian-government-raise-revenue-for-the-first-100-years-without-an-income-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[without]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/02/how-did-the-australian-government-raise-revenue-for-the-first-100-years-without-an-income-tax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first national income tax in Austraila was in about 1880, how did the government get revenue before this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first national income tax in Austraila was in about 1880, how did the government get revenue before this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/02/how-did-the-australian-government-raise-revenue-for-the-first-100-years-without-an-income-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Liberals the first to try to stifle free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/01/why-are-liberals-the-first-to-try-to-stifle-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/01/why-are-liberals-the-first-to-try-to-stifle-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stifle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/01/why-are-liberals-the-first-to-try-to-stifle-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do liberals preach tolerance and freedom of speech, but then try to stifle anybody who does not agree with them? They often get very caustic with those who don&#8217;t agree with them and they think that is OK. However, if you disagree with them, it is not politically correct. Personally, I think they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do liberals preach tolerance and freedom of speech, but then try to stifle anybody who does not agree with them?  They often get very caustic with those who don&#8217;t agree with them and they think that is OK.  However, if you disagree with them, it is not politically correct.  Personally, I think they are the ones who are politically incorrect more often than any other group.<br />
Some examples of liberals trying to stifle free speech.  Liberal congress trying to figure out a way to stifle conservative talk radio, which the public obviously wants more than liberal talk radio.  College campuses allowing ultra-left wing speakers but cancelling even moderately conservative speakers appearances.  Enacting hate crime laws that have target conservative viewpoints and definitely allowing hate speech by liberals toward conservatives.  Some of the activities that happen here on YA.  That is simply the beginning of the list.  Many, but not all, of those liberals who preach tolerance are, in my opinion, the most intolerant people on the face of the earth.<br />
LOL, I give examples and the liberals all disappear.<br />
Comparing Jerry Falwell and Reverend Wright!!!!  </p>
<p>Please.  I disagreed with Jerry Falwell on many things and did not want to be associated with him or his movement, but I never heard him condemn America.</p>
<p>Reverend Wright&#8217;s words were hate speech and simply serve to prove part of my thesis.  A conservative could never get away with condemning black america in the way that Wright did with whites.  </p>
<p>One side is hate speech (the conservative) and should be stifled.  The other is freedom of speech (liberal) and should be allowed.<br />
You misunderstood.  I am willing to consider Falwell as a conservative and Wright as a liberal.  In fact again you are actually reinforcing my point.  Just as many liberal would disown the viewpoints of Wright, likewise whether you believe it or not many conservatives such as me would not want to be associated with much of what Falwell said or how he operated.  But you, not me, did try to compare them.  If I go with that I see that Obama called Wright his spiritual mentor and attended his church and was involved in his teaching for 20 years.  That does carry some weight.  I would be willing to accept that if a conservative politician had called Jerry Falwell his spiritual mentor and was involved with his church and teaching for 20 years that I would at least partially hold that politician responsible for the viewpoints that Falwell promulgated.  I still stand by what I see as a double standard, which is reinforced when you compare these two figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/09/01/why-are-liberals-the-first-to-try-to-stifle-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is sexual harassment protected under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/21/is-sexual-harassment-protected-under-the-free-speech-clause-of-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/21/is-sexual-harassment-protected-under-the-free-speech-clause-of-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/21/is-sexual-harassment-protected-under-the-free-speech-clause-of-the-first-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I of course am only referring to sexual harassment in speech; not in physical contact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I of course am only referring to sexual harassment in speech; not in physical contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/07/21/is-sexual-harassment-protected-under-the-free-speech-clause-of-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

