<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Hendrix &#187; Supreme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/tag/supreme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com</link>
	<description>Political Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Henry Rollins: The Supreme Court &amp; Tea Parties</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/11/19/henry-rollins-the-supreme-court-tea-parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/11/19/henry-rollins-the-supreme-court-tea-parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/11/19/henry-rollins-the-supreme-court-tea-parties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rocker, author, and activist Henry Rollins recently joined Mike Papantonio on Ring of Fire to talk about his latest tour, his recent role on the hit show Sons of Anarchy, and he shared his thoughts on Sarah Palin and the tea party movement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JzXPicC2PeY?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JzXPicC2PeY?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Rocker, author, and activist Henry Rollins recently joined Mike Papantonio on Ring of Fire to talk about his latest tour, his recent role on the hit show Sons of Anarchy, and he shared his thoughts on Sarah Palin and the tea party movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/11/19/henry-rollins-the-supreme-court-tea-parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin is an insult to women. Can&#8217;t name even Dred Scott Supreme Court Case.</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/03/sarah-palin-is-an-insult-to-women-cant-name-even-dred-scott-supreme-court-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/03/sarah-palin-is-an-insult-to-women-cant-name-even-dred-scott-supreme-court-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[can't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/03/sarah-palin-is-an-insult-to-women-cant-name-even-dred-scott-supreme-court-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We won! This video from CBS shows a part of the Couric video that didn&#8217;t air on TV. It shows Biden first, getting the same questions as Palin and handling them just fine; then Palin comes on and can&#8217;t even name a Supreme Court decision she disagrees(or name a decision at all) In June 2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iDER0IXXDCQ?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iDER0IXXDCQ?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
We won! This video from CBS shows a part of the Couric video that didn&#8217;t air on TV. It shows Biden first, getting the same questions as Palin and handling them just fine; then Palin comes on and can&#8217;t even name a Supreme Court decision she disagrees(or name a decision at all) In June 2008 the Supreme Court made a decision that adversely affected all citizens of Alaska directly when they cut the Exxon-Valdez settlement to 500 million from 2.5 billion. Four months ago! This woman has a 1 in 5 chance of becoming President if McCain gets elected. <img src='http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Vote Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/10/03/sarah-palin-is-an-insult-to-women-cant-name-even-dred-scott-supreme-court-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anyone know the name of this case that went to Supreme Cort about free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/27/anyone-know-the-name-of-this-case-that-went-to-supreme-cort-about-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/27/anyone-know-the-name-of-this-case-that-went-to-supreme-cort-about-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[went]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/27/anyone-know-the-name-of-this-case-that-went-to-supreme-cort-about-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I only remember it vaguely, but it was a case that possibly went to the Supreme Court about a 15-17 year old boy who wrote a speech, as he or a friend was running for class president (?) But the thing was, his speech was terribly inappropriate and insinuated sex? Thanks for any help Also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only remember it vaguely, but it was a case that possibly went to the Supreme Court about a 15-17 year old boy who wrote a speech, as he or a friend was running for class president (?) But the thing was, his speech was terribly inappropriate and insinuated sex? Thanks for any help<br />
Also any ideas on where I can read the speech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/27/anyone-know-the-name-of-this-case-that-went-to-supreme-cort-about-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does the new supreme court justice Kagan think it&#8217;s ok to ban free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/why-does-the-new-supreme-court-justice-kagan-think-its-ok-to-ban-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/why-does-the-new-supreme-court-justice-kagan-think-its-ok-to-ban-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT'S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/why-does-the-new-supreme-court-justice-kagan-think-its-ok-to-ban-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kagan told supreme court justice Roberts that if a book suggested that you vote for a particular candidate for whatever office, that the government should have the right to ban that book from the people. Doesn&#8217;t this infringe on the First Amendment&#8217;s freedom of speech?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kagan told supreme court justice Roberts that if a book suggested that you vote for a particular candidate for whatever office, that the government should have the right to ban that book from the people.  Doesn&#8217;t this infringe on the First Amendment&#8217;s freedom of speech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/08/09/why-does-the-new-supreme-court-justice-kagan-think-its-ok-to-ban-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couric Stumps Palin With Supreme Court Question, Extended Version</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/06/25/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question-extended-version/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/06/25/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question-extended-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Couric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Version]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/06/25/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question-extended-version/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin and Joe Biden on Roe v. Wade, right to privacy and Supreme Court decision they&#8217;ve disagreed with]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBt0r9Exv2I?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBt0r9Exv2I?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Sarah Palin and Joe Biden on Roe v. Wade, right to privacy and Supreme Court decision they&#8217;ve disagreed with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/06/25/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question-extended-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Supreme Court case incorporated 1st amendment free speech &amp; free speech to the states?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/25/what-supreme-court-case-incorporated-1st-amendment-free-speech-free-speech-to-the-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/25/what-supreme-court-case-incorporated-1st-amendment-free-speech-free-speech-to-the-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 06:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incorporated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/25/what-supreme-court-case-incorporated-1st-amendment-free-speech-free-speech-to-the-states/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that the case Near v Minnesota was used to ensure that states did not use prior restraint in preventing the press from running an article prior to is printing. I am not sure if this is the proper answer to this question as I don&#8217;t believe it effected free speech. UPDATE- The bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the case Near v Minnesota was used to ensure that states did not use prior restraint in preventing the press from running an article prior to is printing. I am not sure if this is the proper answer to this question as I don&#8217;t believe it effected free speech.<br />
UPDATE- The bill of rights only extended its protections against laws passed by congress. The fourteenth amendment was what extended these protections to state governments, &#038; even then only certain aspects of certain amendments.<br />
 Their WAS a supreme court case that resulted in the incorporation of 1st amendment free speach &#038; free press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/05/25/what-supreme-court-case-incorporated-1st-amendment-free-speech-free-speech-to-the-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONS: If the recent Supreme Court decision regarding campaign finance is a matter of free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/04/10/cons-if-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-regarding-campaign-finance-is-a-matter-of-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/04/10/cons-if-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-regarding-campaign-finance-is-a-matter-of-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/04/10/cons-if-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-regarding-campaign-finance-is-a-matter-of-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. then how come I don&#8217;t have the same rights as an individual ? I can only contribute 2500 dollars to a candidate&#8230;&#8230;whereas the CEO of company X, no longer has a limit to their contribution. So if this is about protecting &#8220;free speech&#8221;&#8230;then why aren&#8217;t I being protected here ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. then how come I don&#8217;t have the same rights as an individual ?</p>
<p>I can only contribute 2500 dollars to a candidate&#8230;&#8230;whereas the CEO of company X, no longer has a limit to their contribution.</p>
<p>So if this is about protecting &#8220;free speech&#8221;&#8230;then why aren&#8217;t I being protected here ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/04/10/cons-if-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-regarding-campaign-finance-is-a-matter-of-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A question about free speech and the Supreme Court ruling against the BCRA of 2002?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/04/a-question-about-free-speech-and-the-supreme-court-ruling-against-the-bcra-of-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/04/a-question-about-free-speech-and-the-supreme-court-ruling-against-the-bcra-of-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/04/a-question-about-free-speech-and-the-supreme-court-ruling-against-the-bcra-of-2002/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you think that the free speech guaranteed in the first amendment applies to companies or should apply to companies?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that the free speech guaranteed in the first amendment applies to companies or should apply to companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2011/01/04/a-question-about-free-speech-and-the-supreme-court-ruling-against-the-bcra-of-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couric Stumps Palin With Supreme Court Question</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/15/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/15/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Couric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/15/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin interviewed by Katie Couric, October 1, 2008]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0rXmuhWrlj4?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0rXmuhWrlj4?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Sarah Palin interviewed by Katie Couric, October 1, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/11/15/couric-stumps-palin-with-supreme-court-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Obama nominating someone to the Supreme Court who thinks there should be limits on free speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/09/26/why-is-obama-nominating-someone-to-the-supreme-court-who-thinks-there-should-be-limits-on-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/09/26/why-is-obama-nominating-someone-to-the-supreme-court-who-thinks-there-should-be-limits-on-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[someone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[there]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/09/26/why-is-obama-nominating-someone-to-the-supreme-court-who-thinks-there-should-be-limits-on-free-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 1996 article in the University of Chicago Law Review Kagan said that the &#8220;Government motives&#8221; for restricting free speech were more important when looking at cases which violate the First Amendment and that should be the focus of the Supreme Court. So, in effect she advocate suppression of free speech. Why would Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 1996 article in the University of Chicago Law Review Kagan said that the &#8220;Government motives&#8221; for restricting free speech were more important when looking at cases which violate the First Amendment and that should be the focus of the Supreme Court. So, in effect she advocate suppression of free speech. Why would Obama nominate someone to the Supreme Court who believes in violating our right to free speech and is this laying the ground work for changing the First Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hendrixcampaign.com/2010/09/26/why-is-obama-nominating-someone-to-the-supreme-court-who-thinks-there-should-be-limits-on-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

